Análisis de la efectividad de la técnica de punción seca en cefaleas: revisión sistemática / Effectiveness of dry needling for headache: A systematic review

Introducción: El uso de tratamientos no farmacológicos en pacientes con cefalea, como la punción seca (PS), está asociado a una baja morbimortalidad y a un bajo coste sanitario. Algunos han demostrado utilidad en la práctica clínica. El objetivo de esta revisión fue analizar el grado de evidencia de la efectividad de la PS en la cefalea.MétodosRevisión sistemática de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados sobre cefalea y PS en las bases de datos biomédicas PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus y PEDro. Se evaluó la calidad de los estudios incluidos mediante la escala PEDro por 2 evaluadores de forma independiente.ResultadosDe un total de 136 estudios, se seleccionaron 8 ensayos clínicos publicados entre 1994 y 2019, incluyendo en total 577 pacientes. Dos estudios evaluaron pacientes con cefalea cervicogénica, otros 2, pacientes con cefalea tensional, y otro, pacientes con migraña. Los otros 3 estudios evaluaron pacientes con cefalea de características mixtas (tensional/migraña). La calidad de los estudios incluidos osciló entre «baja» (3/10) y «alta» (8/10). La eficacia de la PS sobre los episodios de cefalea fue similar a la de los tratamientos con los que se comparó. No obstante, obtuvo mejoras significativas respecto a variables funcionales y de sensibilidad.ConclusionesLa punción seca es una técnica a considerar para el tratamiento de las cefaleas en la consulta, pudiendo utilizarse de forma rutinaria, bien de forma aislada, bien en combinación con terapias farmacológicas. (AU)

Introduction: Non-pharmacological treatment of patients with headache, such as dry needling (DN), is associated with less morbidity and mortality and lower costs than pharmacological treatment. Some of these techniques are useful in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to review the level of evidence for DN in patients with headache.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of randomised clinical trials on headache and DN on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro databases. Methodological quality was evaluated with the Spanish version of the PEDro scale by 2 independent reviewers.ResultsOf a total of 136 studies, we selected 8 randomised clinical trials published between 1994 and 2019, including a total of 577 patients. Two studies evaluated patients with cervicogenic headache, 2 evaluated patients with tension-type headache, one study assessed patients with migraine, and the remaining 3 evaluated patients with mixed-type headache (tension-type headache/migraine). Quality ratings ranged from low (3/10) to high (7/10). The effectiveness of DN was similar to that of the other interventions. DN was associated with significant improvements in functional and sensory outcomes.ConclusionsDry needling should be considered for the treatment of headache, and may be applied either alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments. (AU)

Effectiveness of dry needling for headache: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Non-pharmacological treatment of patients with headache, such as dry needling (DN), is associated with less morbidity and mortality and lower costs than pharmacological treatment. Some of these techniques are useful in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to review the level of evidence for DN in patients with headache. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomised clinical trials on headache and DN on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro databases. Methodological quality was evaluated with the Spanish version of the PEDro scale by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of a total of 136 studies, we selected 8 randomised clinical trials published between 1994 and 2019, including a total of 577 patients. Two studies evaluated patients with cervicogenic headache, 2 evaluated patients with tension-type headache, one study assessed patients with migraine, and the remaining 3 evaluated patients with mixed-type headache (tension-type headache/migraine). Quality ratings ranged from low (3/10) to high (7/10). The effectiveness of DN was similar to that of the other interventions. DN was associated with significant improvements in functional and sensory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dry needling should be considered for the treatment of headache, and may be applied either alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments.

Immersive virtual reality and antigravity treadmill training for gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: a pilot and feasibility study. / Entrenamiento antigravitatorio e inmersivo de realidad virtual para la rehabilitación de la marcha en la enfermedad de Parkinson: estudio piloto y de viabilidad.

INTRODUCTION: Treadmill training is considered an effective intervention to improve gait ability in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). In parallel, virtual reality shows promising intervention with several applications in the inpatient medical setting. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of mechanical gait assistance combined with immersive virtual reality in patients with PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This pilot and feasibility study followed a pre-post study design. The intervention consisted of 12 sessions of 30 minutes, distributed regularly over four consecutive weeks. Participants walked on a treadmill with a body-weight support system set at approximately 20% of body weight and equipped with a virtual reality helmet controlled by a two-handed joystick. Feasibility and intervention outcomes were collected at baseline and after four weeks of intervention. RESULTS: Twelve participants of 60 patients were finally enrolled. Nine of them (75%) completed the treatment intervention with an adherence rate of 97%. Two participants left the study, one of them due to sickness associated with virtual reality and another because of a lack of motivation. There were significant differences associated with small-medium effect sizes when comparing the pre and post values for walk distance, walk speed, balance, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility of the combination of antigravity treadmill and immersive virtual reality system for the rehabilitation of patients with PD.

TITLE: Entrenamiento antigravitatorio e inmersivo de realidad virtual para la rehabilitación de la marcha en la enfermedad de Parkinson: estudio piloto y de viabilidad.Introducción. El entrenamiento en tapiz rodante se considera una intervención eficaz para mejorar la capacidad de la marcha en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson (EP). Paralelamente, la realidad virtual se muestra como una intervención prometedora con diversas aplicaciones en el entorno médico hospitalario. Objetivo. Evaluar la viabilidad y la eficacia preliminar de la asistencia mecánica para la marcha combinada con la realidad virtual inmersiva en pacientes con EP. Pacientes y métodos. Este estudio piloto y de viabilidad siguió un diseño pre-post. La intervención consistió en 12 sesiones de 30 minutos, distribuidas regularmente durante cuatro semanas consecutivas. Los participantes deambularon sobre un tapiz rodante con un sistema de descarga del peso corporal establecido aproximadamente en el 20% del peso corporal y equipados con un casco de realidad virtual controlado por un joystick para cada mano. Las mediciones de viabilidad y tratamiento se recopilaron al inicio del estudio y después de cuatro semanas de intervención. Resultados. De un total de 60 pacientes, se reclutó finalmente a 12 participantes. Nueve de ellos (75%) completaron el tratamiento, con una tasa de adhesión del 97%. Dos participantes abandonaron el estudio, uno debido a náuseas asociadas con la realidad virtual y otro por falta de motivación. Hubo diferencias significativas asociadas con un tamaño del efecto pequeño-mediano al comparar los valores pre y post para la distancia recorrida, velocidad de la marcha, equilibrio y calidad de vida. Conclusiones. El estudio proporcionó evidencia preliminar que apoya la viabilidad de la combinación de un tapiz rodante antigravitatorio y un sistema de realidad virtual inmersivo para la rehabilitación de pacientes con EP.

Effectiveness of dry needling for headache: A systematic review. / Análisis de la efectividad de la técnica de punción seca en cefaleas: revisión sistemática.

INTRODUCTION: Non-pharmacological treatment of patients with headache, such as dry needling (DN), is associated with less morbidity and mortality and lower costs than pharmacological treatment. Some of these techniques are useful in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to review the level of evidence for DN in patients with headache. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomised clinical trials on headache and DN on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PEDro databases. Methodological quality was evaluated with the Spanish version of the PEDro scale by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of a total of 136 studies, we selected 8 randomised clinical trials published between 1994 and 2019, including a total of 577 patients. Two studies evaluated patients with cervicogenic headache, 2 evaluated patients with tension-type headache, one study assessed patients with migraine, and the remaining 3 evaluated patients with mixed-type headache (tension-type headache/migraine). Quality ratings ranged from low (3/10) to high (7/10). The effectiveness of DN was similar to that of the other interventions. DN was associated with significant improvements in functional and sensory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Dry needling should be considered for the treatment of headache, and may be applied either alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments.